Seven months after a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos ordered the
Federal Government to release to Nigerians the list of public officials
from whom public funds had been recovered, the list has yet to be
released by the authorities.
Justice Hadiza Shagari had
on July 6, 2017, in her judgment in a suit filed by the Socio-Economic
Rights and Accountability Project, directed the Federal Government to
“immediately” release the names of the officials, the circumstances
under which the funds were recovered and the exact amount recovered from
each public official.
While responding to the judgment, the
Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar
Malami, had said the government would publish the names of the looters,
in compliance with the court order, noting that the Federal Government
totally agreed with the ruling.
The Federal Government had on
June 4, 2016, through the Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji
Lai Mohammed, disclosed that it had recovered cash sums of
N78,325,354,631.82, $185,119,584.61, £3,508,355.46 and €11,250 between
May 29, 2015, and May 25, 2016. He added that the assets and cash
seized under interim forfeiture totalled $9bn, N126bn, £2.4m and
€303,399.
And on October 12, 2017, the acting Chairman of EFCC,
Ibrahim Magu, said at a forum that the cash recovered through the
whistleblower policy had risen to over N30bn, in different foreign
currencies.
Meanwhile, the refusal to release the list or obey
the court judgment was preceded by the promise voluntarily made in
December 2015 by the President when he said he would unveil the names of
the looters. He had said the only thing stopping the Central Bank of
Nigeria from releasing the list at that time was to avoid jeopardising
investigations and further recoveries.
He also reiterated the
promise in May 2016 at an anti-corruption summit in London that he would
give a comprehensive report on the loot recovered on May 29, 2016 –
Democracy Day, which he failed to do.
And till date, the names of the looters have yet to be released.
Speaking
on the protracted delay, the Executive Director, SERAP, Adetokunbo
Mumuni, said the refusal of the Buhari-led administration to make the
list public, as directed by the court, had called into the question the
much-touted integrity of the administration.
He said,
“Once you make a promise, you should fulfil it. They said they would
fight corruption, judgement was obtained to help you to fight
corruption, yet you are not obeying the court order, it questions your
integrity and sincerity as a government. This government is not doing
what it promised.”
Also, the President of Campaign for Democracy,
Mr. Bako Abdul Usman, described as unfortunate the way the present
administration had been flouting court orders, saying even though the
African Union made the President the model of anti-corruption fight in
Africa, that “does not really hold water back home when looking at the
nitty-gritty.”
He added, “If that list is released today, people
within the circle of the President would be part and parcel of it. That
is why there is a constraint in releasing the list. Impunity,
high-handedness and corrupt practices are easy to come by in this
administration.”
A legal practitioner and public affairs analyst,
Liborous Oshoma, said a government that won an election on account of
its promise to be transparent didn’t have to be compelled by the court
to name and shame looters, stressing that the excuses it gave had
already made it another round of propaganda.
He noted that the
reluctance to release the list could be because the government bloated
the amount it recovered, making it difficult to put names to the
figures. He explained that it would be an investment in uncertainty to
expect the government to release the names before the next general
elections because it might need the influence and monetary contribution
of some of the looters.
He added, “Do they (government) also need
a legal paperwork to release the names of those that owned up
voluntarily, not due to their conscience but because it was either
obvious or government was closing in on them? To serve as deterrence to
others, shouldn’t a transparent government release those names.
“Now
that elections are here, these (looters) are the same people they would
go back to source money from. So, if anybody believes that the
government would name and shame those looters before the election, the
person must be joking, because some alleged criminals would even be
embraced because of their money and influence, especially when you have
desperation for a second term.”
But when asked when the names
would be released as he promised in July 2017, the AGF said a committee
set up by the President was still auditing the list of the looters.
In
a text message he sent as a response to Saturday PUNCH’s inquiry, he
said, “Audit work is in progress by a committee put in place by the
President.”
http://punchng.com/seven-months-after-fg-fails-to-release-looters-list/
No comments:
Post a Comment