The Nigerian Senate on Tuesday, November 24, has
begun the investigation into the failure of the office of the Attorney
General of the Federation (AGF) to prosecute the chairman of Code of
Conduct Tribunal, Justice Danladi Umar over allegation of corruption.
The Upper Chamber received the petition alleging corrupt
practices against Umar on November 5 and was submitted to the Ethics
committee for consideration, Daily Post reports
The petition was presented by Ant-Corruption Network against the office of AGF faulting it failure to prosecute Umar.
The group petition reads in part: “We have become aware that the
office of the Attorney-General has failed in this sacrosanct duty to
Nigeria in one particular case and would like the office to explain why
on June 24, 2014, the chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission wrote an “investigation Report” to the Hon. Attorney-General
of the Federation (Ref No: EFCC/EC/JUS?07?117). The report was about
evidence of criminal allegations against two suspects from Code of
Conduct Tribunal, namely – (1) Hon. Justice Danladi Umar and Ali Gambo
Abdulahi.
“The Attorney-General then instructed the chairman of EFCC by
minuting on the same letter to proceed to prosecute the suspect. This
was communicated in writing to the chairman EFCC with reference No.
HAGF/EFCC/2014/Vol./19 dated 26 June 2014.
“However, only the second suspect, Ali Gambo was prosecuted. The
very first suspect who is the main suspect, Mr. Danladi has been left
un-prosecuted. This is breach of the order of the AGF. Since then, the
office of the Attorney General has been silent on this failure to
prosecute as directed.”
It was learnt that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had
earlier noted the Umar could not be prosecuted for allegation of N10
million bribery allegation because the evidence against the chairman of
CCT was not weighty.
In a related development, the Civil Society Network Against Corruption had demanded for the immediate suspension of Umar as the chairman CCT over various allegations leveled against him.
The group noted that it was irresponsible for Umar to preside over
any case, particularly corruption cases at the tribunal until the
conclusion of his investigation by the EFCC.
No comments:
Post a Comment